Texas is the only state that allows opt-out

Workers' compensation in most states is mandatory — every employer must carry it, and in exchange, injured workers get statutorily defined benefits but generally can't sue the employer in tort.

Texas is the exception. Under Tex. Lab. Code § 406.002, Texas employers can choose to be "subscribers" (carry workers' comp) or "non-subscribers" (opt out). About 25-30% of Texas employers are non-subscribers, including HEB, Walmart's Texas operations, Costco, and many large retail, hospitality, and construction companies.

If your employer is a non-subscriber and you're injured on the job, you don't go through the workers' comp system at all. Instead, you have the right to file a direct negligence lawsuit against your employer — and the legal framework is dramatically more plaintiff-favorable than ordinary negligence cases.

The game-changer: § 406.033

The reason non-subscriber cases are so valuable comes from a single statute: Tex. Lab. Code § 406.033. The statute is short, but its effect is huge.

Tex. Lab. Code § 406.033(a)
"In an action against an employer who does not have workers' compensation insurance coverage to recover damages for personal injuries or death sustained by an employee in the course and scope of the employment, it is not a defense that: (1) the employee was guilty of contributory negligence; (2) the employee assumed the risk of injury or death; or (3) the injury or death was caused by the negligence of a fellow employee."

Read what was just stripped away:

  • Contributory negligence. The employer can't argue you caused your own injury through carelessness.
  • Assumption of risk. The employer can't argue you knew the job was dangerous and accepted that risk.
  • Fellow servant rule. The employer can't argue your coworker's mistake — rather than the employer's negligence — caused the injury.

These three defenses are the bread and butter of employer defense in ordinary workplace negligence cases. In a non-subscriber case, they're gone by statute. The employer has to defend the case on the merits of their own conduct — without blaming you, without blaming your coworkers, and without arguing you accepted the risk.

What you have to prove

To win a non-subscriber case, you generally have to show:

  1. Employment relationship. You were the employer's employee (not an independent contractor — a contested distinction in many cases).
  2. Course and scope. You were injured while doing your job.
  3. Negligence. The employer breached a legal duty to you.
  4. Causation. The breach caused the injury.
  5. Damages. You have compensable harm.

The employer's "legal duty" to its employees includes:

  • Providing a reasonably safe workplace
  • Providing safe equipment, tools, and materials
  • Hiring and retaining competent coworkers
  • Providing adequate training and supervision
  • Warning of non-obvious hazards
  • Promulgating and enforcing safety rules

The legal threshold is "ordinary negligence" — not gross negligence, not recklessness. If the employer failed to do what a reasonably prudent employer in similar circumstances would have done, that's enough.

Why non-subscriber cases are worth so much

Compare what you can recover in a non-subscriber lawsuit vs. workers' comp:

Workers' compensation benefits (subscriber case)

  • Medical bills (paid, often with caps and provider restrictions)
  • Temporary income benefits (around 70% of average weekly wage, with statutory cap)
  • Impairment income benefits (calculated by impairment rating × percentage)
  • In severe cases, supplemental income or lifetime income benefits
  • No pain and suffering
  • No mental anguish
  • No loss of consortium
  • No punitive damages

Non-subscriber lawsuit damages

  • Full medical expenses (past and future)
  • Lost wages (past and future, at full value — not the 70% workers' comp formula)
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Pain and suffering — past and future
  • Mental anguish
  • Physical impairment
  • Disfigurement
  • Loss of consortium for spouse
  • Punitive damages if the employer acted with gross negligence

The result: a workers' comp claim worth $40,000 in benefits might be a non-subscriber lawsuit worth $300,000 or more on the same physical injury. The gap is the non-economic and full-economic damages workers' comp excludes.

Common employer arguments in non-subscriber cases

Even though § 406.033 strips contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and fellow servant, employers still try other defenses:

  • "You were an independent contractor." If true, § 406.033 doesn't apply. Often disputed — Texas applies a multi-factor test focused on control over work, payment structure, and integration into business operations.
  • "You were not in course and scope." If you were on a personal errand, off-duty, or doing something outside your job duties, the case fails. Common dispute in cases involving company vehicles, working from home, or work-related travel.
  • "We weren't negligent." Pure factual defense — the employer claims they did everything reasonably possible to prevent the injury.
  • "Pre-existing condition." The employer claims your current symptoms are from old injuries, not the workplace incident.
  • "You signed a pre-injury waiver." Some non-subscribers ask employees to sign waivers or arbitration agreements as a condition of employment. Texas case law has limited the enforceability of these. Storage & Processors, Inc. v. Reyes, 134 S.W.3d 190 (Tex. 2004), invalidated certain pre-injury waivers. Other "occupational injury benefit plan" (OIBP) programs may be enforceable but limit recovery in specific ways.

The OIBP wrinkle

Many non-subscribers don't simply leave employees with no options. They create an "Occupational Injury Benefit Plan" (OIBP) — a private benefits program that provides some workers' comp-like coverage in exchange for employees waiving certain legal rights.

OIBPs vary widely:

  • Some provide medical and limited wage replacement
  • Some require participants to use approved doctors
  • Some require mandatory arbitration of disputes
  • Some include pre-injury releases or limits on damages

If you've been injured at a non-subscriber and signed OIBP paperwork at hiring, the analysis is more complex. Some OIBP terms are enforceable; others aren't. The Federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) sometimes preempts state law on these plans, adding further complexity.

Critical: don't sign anything from your employer's OIBP administrator after a workplace injury — including releases, arbitration agreements, or medical authorizations — without talking to an attorney first.

What to do after a non-subscriber injury

Practical steps in the first 30 days:

  1. Report the injury in writing to your employer immediately. Get a copy of the report. Keep your copy.
  2. Get medical attention — but be careful about going only to "approved" providers if you suspect OIBP terms apply. You typically have the right to your own doctor.
  3. Don't sign anything from the employer, the OIBP administrator, or any insurance company without legal review. Even routine-looking forms can contain releases or waivers.
  4. Identify witnesses — coworkers who saw the incident, who heard discussions about the hazard, who can describe the work conditions.
  5. Photograph the scene — the equipment, the location, the conditions, any visible defects.
  6. Preserve evidence — request that the employer preserve all relevant safety records, training records, equipment maintenance records, and similar documents.
  7. Document your injury and recovery in a journal (see our recovery documentation guide).
  8. Call a Texas-licensed personal injury attorney. Non-subscriber cases are technical, the stakes are usually high, and good representation pays for itself many times over.
★ Non-Subscriber Cases Are Lawsuit Territory

Don't sign before you talk.

If your employer is a non-subscriber and you've been injured on the job, the case is potentially worth far more than the OIBP will offer. Free consultation, no pressure, no fee unless we win.

Free Case Review →